Set your enterprise quantum-safe transition strategy: what moves first, when, and at what cost.
QS-ETSF builds the enterprise-wide transition strategy from what you already know about your systems: how important each one is, the data it protects, its exposure to quantum threats, how hard it is to change and how much it depends on vendors. It sets the migration waves, a timeline based on the capacity of your teams, and the budget year by year, so leadership can decide on the programme and fund it.
Start before discovery, from system knowledge your teams already hold. Every version of the plan is kept on record.
Start from what you already know about your systems.
A transition strategy is decided system by system, not certificate by certificate. QS-ETSF works at that level. Describe each business system once, from your own knowledge or starting from pre-assessed industry templates, and the whole programme follows from it.
No need to wait for full discovery.
Shape the strategy early from system knowledge your architects, owners and risk teams already hold.
Every system gets a place, a time and a cost.
Each system is rated, assigned to a migration wave, scheduled and costed, so the strategy covers the whole estate.
One picture for leadership.
Exposure, sequence, schedule and budget always describe the same plan.
Core banking platform
What QS-ETSF captures for every system.
Business importance
What does the organisation stand to lose?
Business priority and business impact.
Data at stake
How much is exposed, and for how long?
Data sensitivity and how long the data is kept.
Quantum threat exposure
How could a quantum attacker use it?
Store now, decrypt later; trust now, forge later; deploy now, exploit later.
Effort to change
What will the migration take?
Complexity, crypto-agility, vendor dependency, estimated duration and cost range.
A plan tested against your real constraints before you commit to it.
Transition plans often come apart on what a risk ranking leaves out: too few people, a fixed deadline, a capped budget, a vendor who is not ready. QS-ETSF plans against your capacity, deadline and budget, keeps vendor-dependent systems in view, and tells you plainly when a plan will not fit.
Programme at a glance
1
2
3
4
5
6
Delivery capacity
How much can we run at once?
Set how many system migrations your teams can carry in parallel, for the programme or for each wave.
Target dates
Will we make the deadline?
Measure the plan against the date you must meet. Any shortfall is shown, never hidden by stretching the plan to fit.
Budget
What if funding is capped?
Set a budget ceiling and see how it reshapes the timeline and the spend in each year.
Vendors
Who else has to move first?
Systems that depend on a vendor's post-quantum roadmap are visible in every wave, so outreach starts early.
Risk appetite
How cautious should we be?
Choose a conservative, balanced or assertive posture and tune what matters most to your organisation.
Your experts' judgement
What do our people know?
Move any system to the wave your team chooses. The decision is kept and recorded, not overwritten.
What-if, side by side
Compare alternative plans against your real set of systems: more waves, more capacity, a later deadline, a tighter budget. Each option is re-planned and given a clear verdict, without touching the strategy you have saved.
One strategy, every team working from it.
Board and executives
A programme you can approve
Scope, sequence, end date and investment in one board-ready report.
CISOs and risk leaders
Priorities you can defend
A clear reason why each system sits where it does in the order of work.
Programme managers
One schedule to run from
Every system in a wave and every wave on the timeline, with each change to the plan on record.
Finance
Spend you can budget for
Cost ranges phased by year that change when the plan changes.
Strategy and architecture teams
No more spreadsheet strategies
One shared register of systems and one plan, in place of disconnected workbooks.
Consultants and integrators
Many clients, one method
Separate programmes for each client, with reusable templates from one engagement to the next.
From system knowledge to an approved programme.
Frame the programme
Set your target date, delivery capacity, budget and risk posture.
Bring in your systems
Import your list of business systems from a spreadsheet, or start from pre-assessed industry templates of typical systems.
Shape and test the plan
Review the waves, apply your team's judgement and compare alternatives until the plan holds.
Approve and govern
Issue board-ready reports, keep named versions of the plan and a record of changes.
What sets QS-ETSF apart.
Strategy before discovery
Build the strategy from system-level knowledge and pre-assessed industry templates, without waiting for a full cryptographic inventory.
Guidance on programme shape
Get a recommended number of waves and programme length from the profile of your systems and your risk posture, and apply it directly to the plan.
Recommendations offered, not imposed
When a system's details change and a different wave fits it better, QS-ETSF suggests the move for you to accept. Nothing is moved silently.
A method you can explain
A dedicated report sets out how systems are rated and placed in waves, so stakeholders can see the reasoning behind the order of work.
Every version on record
Keep named versions of the plan, see exactly what changed since any of them, and return to one if needed.
Runs where your data must stay
On your own servers or on isolated hosts without internet access, with role-based access and a log of changes.
See your transition strategy take shape.
Bring a list of your key business systems. We will walk your team through the order of work, the timeline and the budget QS-ETSF produces.
Structured walkthrough on your own list of systems. Nothing installed. No implementation commitment required.