REMEDIATION INTELLIGENCE · Layer 3 · AVINYASQ PLATFORM

Knowing your risk is not the same as knowing what to do about it.

Remediation Intelligence is the reasoning layer of the AvinyaSQ platform. It takes what discovery found and risk scoring rated, and decides what to migrate, how, and in what order — with the reasoning behind every decision recorded so it holds up under board, regulator, and audit review.

AVINYASQ PLATFORM · RI AT Layer 3ACTIVE
Layer 3 Plan & Execute
Migration Phase
RIRemediation Intelligence
DECISIONSCAB-READY
REASONINGAUDITABLE
RECOMMENDAUTOMATED
PLATFORM LAYER PIPELINE
QRIDiagnostic
QS-ETSFStrategy
UCDIDiscovery
QRAMRisk
Rem - IIntel
Rem - EExecution
— HOW IT WORKS

From risk assessment to defensible, automated migration decisions.

THE ENGINEWHAT IT DOES

Detection & Recommendation

Evaluates every cryptographic asset the platform has discovered and scored, and produces a typed, prioritised recommendation — what needs to change, and to what target.

Governed Playbooks

Each recommendation follows a reviewed migration approach — a defined playbook for how that class of asset moves to a quantum-safe target, rather than a case-by-case judgment call.

Planning & Sequencing

Recommendations are sequenced into a financially-phased programme — migration horizons and dependency order, aligned to the platform's wave-planning methodology.

Compliance

Every asset is checked against the regulatory frameworks it operates under. A framework violation raises the priority of the affected recommendation — compliance is wired into the sequencing, not reconciled afterwards.

Input

Remediation Intelligence takes the platform's discovery and risk-scoring evidence for every cryptographic asset, and reasons over each asset and its cryptographic artefacts.

Output

A prioritised, framework-cited migration recommendation for every asset, sequenced into a phased programme — each recommendation carrying the reasoning that produced it.

Why

A recommendation is only actionable if the people signing off can see why it was made. Every recommendation carries a decision trace — designed to reproduce consistently, and to make any later change to the record verifiable.

TWO VIEWS · ONE DECISION TRACE

The Defensible Record

For the room that must sign off

For the board, the Change Advisory Board, the regulator, and the auditor

Per-asset recommendation with its rationale, the frameworks cited, and the inputs that drove it
A compliance view per framework — evidence, not a generic alignment claim
A record structured for review — the recommendation, its reasoning, and its integrity check, in a form a governance body can examine
A decision trace designed to reproduce — so a reviewer can re-derive how a recommendation was reached
TYPICAL READER:
CISO · COMPLIANCE OFFICER · AUDIT / CAB
The Operating Reasoning

For the people who run the migration

For the programme manager, the architect, and the engineer

A per-asset migration roadmap — horizons and phasing aligned to the platform's wave plan
Typed recommendations that downstream execution acts on
Recommendation-level reasoning the architect can test against their own judgment
Snapshot history and audit logs — the record of every recommendation issued
TYPICAL READER:
PROGRAMME MANAGER · SECURITY ARCHITECT · INTEGRATION ENGINEER
— WHO IT'S FOR

Built for the teams that run and defend the migration.

01

CISO / Security Director

The reasoning behind every migration decision, in a form you can take into a board or Change Advisory Board review — not just the recommendation, but why it was made and what it was checked against.

02

Cryptography Programme Manager

A prioritised, sequenced migration programme across every asset the platform has discovered — the record of what was recommended, in what order, and why, that a multi-year programme can be run and defended from.

03

Compliance Officer

A per-framework compliance view drawn from the same reasoning that produced the recommendations — evidence an audit committee can examine directly, rather than a separate alignment claim assembled after the fact.

“

Increasingly, an auditor or regulator may not accept a migration recommendation on trust — they will ask why one asset was prioritised over another, and what framework the decision was checked against. Remediation Intelligence is built to answer both: every recommendation carries its reasoning and is evaluated against the regulatory frameworks that apply — across the families a multinational enterprise operates under, including CNSA, NIST, FIPS, BSI, and ETSI.

— THE NEXT STEP

Ready to turn risk scoring into actionable remediation playbooks?

Experience Remediation Intelligence reasoning engine and generate regulatory-grade migration plans for your estate.

Structured walkthrough on your own list of systems. Nothing installed. No implementation commitment required.